Under the Net

Under the Net

Share this post

Under the Net
Under the Net
Errata

Errata

Kieran Setiya's avatar
Kieran Setiya
Jun 14, 2025
∙ Paid
41

Share this post

Under the Net
Under the Net
Errata
25
8
Share

It is now a more or less biennial event: a professional philosopher, employed in an Anglophone philosophy department, publishes a book denouncing “analytic philosophy,” the predominant mode of the discipline in which they work.

I don’t accuse these authors of hypocrisy: if analytic philosophers are wasting their time, it can only be a good thing to displace them from their jobs. But I am dismayed at how little progress the detractors have made. They seem no closer to defining what “analytic philosophy” is; and their objections to it turn, to a disheartening degree, on a distorted picture of contemporary philosophy as funded by “intuition” and therefore bankrupt—a picture that rests on dubious sociology and epistemology alike.

Christoph Schuringa’s new book, A Social History of Analytic Philosophy, is the latest iteration of the trend. It differs from earlier installments in being more historical and less directly argumentative, billing itself as “ideology critique.” Analytic philosophy …

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Under the Net to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Kieran Setiya
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share